July 9, 2012
Where a sentencing court fails to address, even fleetingly, a meritorious argument in mitigation that is not a stock argument, the sentence must be vacated and remanded for consideration of that argument.
The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals vacated and remanded a decision by U.S. District Judge Rudolph T. Randa, Eastern District of Wisconsin.
Vincente Ramirez-Mendoza was part of a large drug trafficking organization. In April or May 2010, Roberto Vizcaino-Ortiz introduced Ramirez-Mendoza to his brother, Hector Vizcaino-Ortiz. Ramirez-Mendoza agreed to act as a middleman for marijuana transactions between Hector and a supplier, Jose Rodriguez. The arrangement lasted through August 2010, when Hector stopped paying Rodriguez for marijuana bought on consignment.
READ more here:
United States v. Vincente Ramirez-Mendoza
|Chicago Daily Law Bulletin | Chicago Lawyer | Chicago Lawyer Network | Law Bulletin Publishing Co.|
You must be logged in to post a comment.